I'm interested in how we use and understand the meaning of the term Being. It seems to be used in different ways. In this conversation and the work in general it seems to be used in the context of becoming more whole, and having a higher development. De Salzmann's book is called 'The Reality of Being'. In Beelzebub's Tales, Ch 30 Art Beelzebub refers to his species as one-natured beings. In Purgatory he talks about the role of Tetartocosmoses (I assume he means humans) as assimilating and transforming planetary substances, but having the possibility of receiving and transforming substances from the sun and planets to form a Kesdjan body and becoming two-natured Beings. Then he talks about the possibility of transforming still higher cosmological substances to form the highest being body of objective reason, however he doesn't then say we then become 3 natured beings. Perhaps when there is 3 we become complete, whole and in that sense one-natured like himself.
🤍
Lee was on 🔥
I'm interested in how we use and understand the meaning of the term Being. It seems to be used in different ways. In this conversation and the work in general it seems to be used in the context of becoming more whole, and having a higher development. De Salzmann's book is called 'The Reality of Being'. In Beelzebub's Tales, Ch 30 Art Beelzebub refers to his species as one-natured beings. In Purgatory he talks about the role of Tetartocosmoses (I assume he means humans) as assimilating and transforming planetary substances, but having the possibility of receiving and transforming substances from the sun and planets to form a Kesdjan body and becoming two-natured Beings. Then he talks about the possibility of transforming still higher cosmological substances to form the highest being body of objective reason, however he doesn't then say we then become 3 natured beings. Perhaps when there is 3 we become complete, whole and in that sense one-natured like himself.