Zen, Yoga, Gurdjieff: Lee's Gurdjieff Newsletter

Zen, Yoga, Gurdjieff: Lee's Gurdjieff Newsletter

Share this post

Zen, Yoga, Gurdjieff: Lee's Gurdjieff Newsletter
Zen, Yoga, Gurdjieff: Lee's Gurdjieff Newsletter
Objective Goodness, part I
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Objective Goodness, part I

Lee van Laer's avatar
Lee van Laer
Jun 17, 2024
∙ Paid
9

Share this post

Zen, Yoga, Gurdjieff: Lee's Gurdjieff Newsletter
Zen, Yoga, Gurdjieff: Lee's Gurdjieff Newsletter
Objective Goodness, part I
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
1
Share

Photo: Rebecca van Laer with Alina Hansen, the granddaughter of the late Sarah Hansen née van Laer.

April 13.

I've had several good conversations with my wife over the past day or two about the nature of goodness. In addition, I've created several podcasts about the search for a contact—a personal, intimate contact—with this quality of Being.

I don't think one sees how every concept of goodness automatically clusters itself around the ego. All goodness is about me, because I’m the arbiter of goodness. After all, every goodness that is perceived is perceived… by whom?

Me, of course—and so, in my naïvete, I believe that I determine the good. That it exists of me and through me, and that what I think of as good is the good. Religion and society and culture and government also try to tell me what’s good, of course; and good thereby invariably becomes a commodity to be bought and sold.

My ego takes note of these external inputs about good, but in the end, I’m a merchant – I imagine myself a masterful buyer and seller of good. I can trade in it; I can make a profit in it for myself. If I trade in the good of the body, I can get food and sex and so on; and if I trade in the good of the mind, I can get money and power.

So this is a rough snapshot of how I see the good.

Yet this isn't what the good is at all; it’s merely an abstract construction that arises from desire, and the perversity of egoistic will.

Real good is not of me and does not belong to me. I am able, if I discriminate, to perceive real good; but it doesn’t belong to me, and I don’t control it. Because of its nature, I can’t even affect it. I can only affect the objects, events, circumstances, and conditions around me; and although I may rearrange their relationships, subjectively, I cannot actually destroy the metaphysical good in them, even though I can destroy what ordinary good might ultimately arise from them.

This is one of the strange qualities of goodness, that on the metaphysical level, it can never be damaged, but on the physical level – that's another thing entirely.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Zen, Yoga, Gurdjieff: Lee's Gurdjieff Newsletter to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Lee van Laer
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More